Actually, it seems to be a limitation of ColdSpring that beans created by a
factory-bean/factory-method can't participate in circular dependencies at
all.  I can imagine a case where a no-arg factory-method could participate,
but the general case seems to be intractable.

Now that I think of it, a no-arg factory-method followed by an init-method
would mimic quite closely the way the "normal" beans are initialized.  Has
anyone else been thinking along these lines?  Not perceived to be a problem?

Jaime Metcher

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaime
> Metcher
> Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2007 7:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [coldspring-dev] Dynamic bean properties redux
>
>
> After more investigation, a couple of potential downsides to
> method number 3
> are apparent.  Firstly, all alternatives will be instantiated even though
> only one will be used for a given app.  Not a problem if the
> beanFactory is
> shared across apps.  Secondly, the use of a factory-bean makes
> the config a
> little bit more prone to runaway circular dependencies. Again not
> necessarily a problem.
>
> And then there's method number 4:
>
> 4. Load multiple XML config files, some of which may be determined at
> runtime.
>
> if (CGI.SERVER_NAME is "widgetsite.com.au")
>       widgetConfigFile = "AUConfig.xml";
> else
>       widgetConfigFile = "USConfig.xml";
>
> application.beanFactory.loadBeansFromXmlFile(widgetConfigFile,true);
> application.beanFactory.loadBeansFromXmlFile("myStandardConfig.xml",true);
>
> Jaime Metcher
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom
> > Chiverton
> > Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 6:38 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [coldspring-dev] Dynamic bean properties redux
> >
> >
> > On Thursday 17 May 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote:
> > > This is a lot more config than the other alternatives, but wrt
> > the app code
> > > I think more transparent.  Thoughts?
> >
> > I like it.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Tom Chiverton
> > Helping to seamlessly morph corporate portals
> > on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
> >
> > ****************************************************
> >
> > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
> >
> > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in
> > England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose
> > registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street
> > Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available for inspection
> > at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation
> > to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by
> > the Law Society.
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY
> >
> > This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named
> > above and may be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are
> > not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any
> > information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other
> > than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or
> > contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete
> > it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.
> >
> > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to