................................. To leave Commie, hyper to http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html .................................
Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Jarmo Lundgren: > > http://www.djh.dk/ejour/0202/12WebortageUSA.html > > Written by an ex-work mate of me from HS, Tuomo V�liaho. > > (Strange: the headlines are in Danish, but the actual text is in English.) > very good ! IMHO the most important points are - reading on web is slower than reading from paper (patience is lower) - it's active ("lean forward" not "lean back") - visual (bcos paper ain't free, limiting pix in paper editions, but for the web, you always have a surplus of photos but not a surplus of text) this definitely creates opportunities for new types of writing and reporting. it makes navigation very important; you wan tto click around an interesting site, but as soon as it sucks you're outa there ! hey japi, as far as you know, ... - when individual journalists and writers get web-based feedback, are they pretty good about actually reading it and acting on it ? - do they get any story ideas from web feedback ? - how enthusiastic are writers about getting multimedia to accompany their articles ? are they able to explain their wants and needs to the multimedia guys ? - have writers expressed interest in online chats ? f
