mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #12472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12472#discussion_r528731278
##########
File path: airflow/providers/google/provider.yaml
##########
@@ -633,3 +633,8 @@ transfers:
- source-integration-name: Google Ads
target-integration-name: Google Cloud Storage (GCS)
python-module: airflow.providers.google.ads.transfers.ads_to_gcs
+
+extra-links:
+ - airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.bigquery.BigQueryConsoleLink
+ -
airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.bigquery.BigQueryConsoleIndexableLink
+ - airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.mlengine.AIPlatformConsoleLink
Review comment:
I prefer to use full import paths for several reasons:
1) a) when you want to use it, you can easily do it without transforming
these values.
```
value =
"airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.mlengine.AIPlatformConsoleLink"
importlib.import_module(value)
```
2) it is easier to find all references to a given class if we use the full
path. I often right-click on a class and copy the reference so that I can
search for it in the code. This way I can easily find class references that
are not in the code, e.g. in mocks or documentation.
<img width="738" alt="Screenshot 2020-11-23 at 15 08 01"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12058428/99971605-b4b7ec80-2d9d-11eb-965b-2a48e36ffee1.png">
<img width="845" alt="Screenshot 2020-11-23 at 15 09 52"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12058428/99971794-f6489780-2d9d-11eb-8025-e4a089a35273.png">
3) We don't commonly use relative path imports in a project, so this
convention may not be obvious to a new contributor. The full path is easier for
new people to understand.
It is no problem to perform the necessary validation in the code and display
a readable error message when there is a problem. A readable message will be
friendlier than a less common convention.
What do you think about it?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]