potiuk commented on pull request #21696: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21696#issuecomment-1057854328
Hey @jedcunningham @kaxil @ashb @dstandish - since there were no objections to [lazy consensus](https://lists.apache.org/thread/43v1dnww37t0o924mzo365ot2p58k864) on that I think it should be ready to final review and merge. I think this is about the last policy in our release practices that we missed and removes the last potential surprise for our users (and it will unblock regular increase of the min supported Airflow versions for Providers (@dstandish - this should give us clear ways on being able to use features from newer Airflow versions in Providers) - it also clears the path for future splitting of the Providers from Airlfow via separate repos as it will enable us to add practical set of rules for CI checks running tests for Providers for different Airlfow versions once we split the repositories. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
