potiuk edited a comment on pull request #22204: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22204#issuecomment-1066092090
> Not sure if Airflow needs this much infrastructure (we only vendor two? dependencies and don’t generally upgrade the existing one), but could be useful if we want to go this route. Yeah. I considered it too, but let's say we might want to do it when we see if it is needed. For now we have `0` vendored-in dependencies and and the aim is to remove them asap - likely with next release (I am going to submit a PR to fix it in cgroupspy in a moment). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
