potiuk commented on PR #31559: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31559#issuecomment-1565238229
> > This is technically breaking backward compatibility (the user _can_ technically access this function is DAGs) but I’m willing to take the chance and assume no-one is actually using it. > > @uranusjr but then what does `meta private` mean in the class? i thought we took that to mean thou shalt not depend on anything in the class and we may change at any time? Yes. I think :meta private: works as designed. And we actually have now a very good way to assess if something is breaking. https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/public-airflow-interface.html Adding the page was one of the reasons to make such decisions quiickly * we do not have abstractoperator package nor AbstractOperator there * there is no found_descendents param described there That technicall means it's not part of the public interface and we are free to change it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
