vincbeck commented on code in PR #33213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33213#discussion_r1306146100


##########
airflow/auth/managers/models/resource_details.py:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+# distributed with this work for additional information
+# regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+# with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+# software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+# KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+# specific language governing permissions and limitations
+# under the License.
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+
+@dataclass
+class ResourceDetails:
+    """
+    Represents the details of a resource.
+
+    All fields must be optional. These details can be used in authorization 
decision.
+    """
+
+    id: str | None = None

Review Comment:
   My only worry is ... what if we add a new resource type in the future in 
Airflow (like `dataset` that has been introduced not a long time ago). We would 
need to create a `is_authorized_<new_resource_type>` in `base_auth_manager` but 
we cannot make it abstract because that would be breaking change. What should 
be the process here?
   
   I am not saying this is a downside of using different methods because we 
would still have the same problem with one method (the unique method would not 
handle the new resource type) but I am just wondering what should be the 
process here in such situation



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to