potiuk commented on PR #37152: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37152#issuecomment-1969144866
> This can also happen in a separate PR, WDYT? Yes. If we just do for information only - I think now failing the CI tests for users is too troublesome.I think maybe printing the information about coverage loss in output is ok- but not failing the PR. > I can't reproduce the static check failure locally. Seems I will manually copy from CI and edit locally Looks like bad merge + the need to regenerate images. It should be reproducible if you run `breeze static-checks --all-files` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
