potiuk commented on PR #41637: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41637#issuecomment-2304259027
> @moiseenkov, I’m happy to revisit #36952, but unfortunately, I can’t commit to a specific timeline at the moment. If you have any available resources, feel free to pick it up in the meantime. Regardless, great job with this PR and moving us closer to more standardized deprecations! :) I think we can also make it in stages. Stage 1. Implement it in google provider (with google-specific deprecated decorator - with time and pre-commit checks. Stage 2. Learn from it and move it (possibly extending this to other cases like version mentioned by @dstandish ) -> either to `common.compat` or future `airflow-sdk` if it's ready and depended on by providers by that time. Google provider is big enough to start "some" standardization efforts - many cases and likely > 50% of all operators and there is a history of things started there and adopted by others and made "common" (system tests for example) I don't think we should aim to have a final solution implemented from day 0 that is applicable to all providers - having google as a good start and "experiment" is IMHO - totally acceptable. WDYT others? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
