pierrejeambrun commented on code in PR #44051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44051#discussion_r1843766159


##########
tests/api_fastapi/core_api/routes/public/test_task_instances.py:
##########
@@ -1127,3 +1127,283 @@ def test_should_respond_dependencies_mapped(self, 
test_client, session):
             "print_the_context/0/dependencies",
         )
         assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
+
+
+class TestGetTaskInstancesBatch(TestTaskInstanceEndpoint):
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
+        "task_instances, update_extras, payload, expected_ti_count",
+        [
+            pytest.param(
+                [
+                    {"queue": "test_queue_1"},
+                    {"queue": "test_queue_2"},
+                    {"queue": "test_queue_3"},
+                ],
+                True,
+                {"queue": ["test_queue_1", "test_queue_2"]},
+                2,
+                id="test queue filter",
+            ),
+            pytest.param(
+                [
+                    {"executor": "test_exec_1"},
+                    {"executor": "test_exec_2"},
+                    {"executor": "test_exec_3"},
+                ],
+                True,
+                {"executor": ["test_exec_1", "test_exec_2"]},
+                2,
+                id="test executor filter",
+            ),
+            pytest.param(
+                [
+                    {"duration": 100},
+                    {"duration": 150},
+                    {"duration": 200},
+                ],
+                True,
+                {"duration_gte": 100, "duration_lte": 200},
+                3,
+                id="test duration filter",
+            ),
+            pytest.param(
+                [
+                    {"execution_date": DEFAULT_DATETIME_1},

Review Comment:
   Yes this is not great. The reason is because this dictionary is used to 
instantiate a `TI` and create it in the database. (With `setattr(attr, value)` 
construct). `logical_date` do not exist on the TI ORM model.
   
   This is coming from the legacy code, maybe there is a better way now to set 
the `logical_date` on a task instance without using the association proxy 
`execution_date` ?
   
   But then the next dictionary is actually the request payload, send by the 
client, which exposes a `logical_date` and not the deprecated `execution_date`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to