potiuk commented on code in PR #44283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44283#discussion_r1855522653


##########
airflow/models/slamiss.py:
##########
@@ -44,3 +49,7 @@ class SlaMiss(Base):
 
     def __repr__(self):
         return str((self.dag_id, self.task_id, 
self.execution_date.isoformat()))
+
+    @property

Review Comment:
   We could also potentially have `v2-11-test` branch at some point of time 
(this is mostly the matter of how many changes like that we are going to have). 
Theorethically, there is nothing wrong with having both branches created and 
having Pull Requests to v2-11-test. We could then later rebase v2-11-test on 
top of v2-10-test. - but that basically means that someone who merges changes 
now would have to resolve the conflicts if that happens - or maybe put the 
whole weitght of this resolving on the shoulders of release manager - both are 
not too good ideas, likely keeping such changes as DRAFT PR and rebasing them 
individually/merging PRs later is a better idea - as it puts the burden on 
solving the issue on the one who is author (i.e. knows best what the intention 
and context was).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to