ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #54505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/54505#discussion_r2353785281
##########
task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/exceptions.py:
##########
@@ -18,16 +18,33 @@
from __future__ import annotations
import enum
+from http import HTTPStatus
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any
-from airflow.exceptions import AirflowException
from airflow.sdk import TriggerRule
if TYPE_CHECKING:
+ from collections.abc import Collection
+
+ from airflow.sdk.definitions.asset import AssetNameRef, AssetUniqueKey,
AssetUriRef
from airflow.sdk.execution_time.comms import ErrorResponse
-class AirflowDagCycleException(AirflowException):
+class AirflowSDKException(Exception):
Review Comment:
Personally, I think that if we don't want to name it differently, then we
should only have one AirflowException instead of a duplicate because of how
it's used across the codebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
