ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #54505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/54505#discussion_r2354872180


##########
airflow-core/tests/unit/serialization/test_serialized_objects.py:
##########
@@ -416,7 +415,7 @@ def __len__(self) -> int:
             equal_exception,
         ),
         (
-            AirflowFailException("uuups, failed :-("),
+            AirflowException("uuups, failed :-("),

Review Comment:
   Had to revert the change on this. AirflowFailException is now raised by SDK 
and when I duplicated it to inherit from AirflowException, this particular test 
started passing. However, there are other imports of AirflowFailException from 
providers that started failing. They were failing because SDK raises a 
different AirflowFailException but we are catching a different one from airflow 
core. I think AirflowException here is a better option. Moreover, serialization 
raises AirflowException and not AirflowFailException. The test was passing 
before because AIrflowFailException inherited the AirflowException raised by 
serialization



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to