potiuk commented on issue #58386: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/58386#issuecomment-3549502679
> Curiosity would be do we expect the hook to support older DBX runtimes without pinning the package? Seems like that might continue to be a sore point. Thanks for aggregating the details. Gemerally you are supposed to use constraints where you install airflow and if you look at 3.1.3 constraintsL https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/constraints-3.1.3/constraints-3.13.txt#L255 - you have 4.1.4 version of the `databricks-sql-connector`. @kacpermuda -> do you think we should limit future provider to limit it unti they fix it ? It seems a bit odd to have it breaking by the client BTW. it seems still like a bug if they release client that is broken temporarily for some people - and it requries to `enroll`. Maybe we should limit it temporarily and open an an issue with databrick that this is not fixed and so that they let us know when it's all generaly available so that we can remove it ? WDYT? I do not know how long it can take and how disruptive it is, but IMHO this is **wrong** to have something that fails if your account is not enrolled to private beta. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
