cuerty opened a new pull request, #60340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60340

   Previously, setting `revisionHistoryLimit: 0` was silently ignored because
   the templates used a truthy check which evaluates 0 as false.
   
   Changed to explicit nil check via a new `_set_if_not_nil` helper to allow 0 
as a valid value.
   
   closes: #60339
   
   ## Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   - [X] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   Generated-by: Claude following [the 
guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#gen-ai-assisted-contributions)
   
   ---
   * Read the **[Pull Request 
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/05_pull_requests.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
 for more information.
   * For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal 
([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvement+Proposals))
 is needed.
   * When adding dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   * For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: 
`{pr_number}.significant.rst` or `{issue_number}.significant.rst`, in 
[airflow-core/newsfragments](https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/newsfragments).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to