Miretpl commented on PR #62334: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62334#issuecomment-3947789087
> I'd propose less generic and rather basic is sufficient. I have never seen git-sync failing. Any yes, as it is a non-service I think no readiness is needed. There is always the initial sync container, the other is "just" taking over for constant sync. So the second is all "post init/startup". Cool! I will add changes for that to this PR too, change the title and bring back to ready state. Marking as draft until that point -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
