jroachgolf84 commented on PR #67248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/67248#issuecomment-4547765634

   @amoghrajesh - got it, that makes sense to me. If that's the case, then we 
shouldn't need this PR, correct? We could use the `from 
airflow.sdk.execution_time.context import AssetStateAccessor` as the keys for 
the return value of `self.asset_states`? i.e.
   
   ```python
   self.asset_states = {
       "asset_a": AssetStateAccessor(...),
       "asset_b": AssetStateAccessor(...)
   }
   ```
   
   Thoughts?
   
   cc: @vincbeck 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to