potiuk commented on issue #10753: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10753#issuecomment-687646305
@dimberman i read your comment in the discussion in the asf devlist. - and if your concern is about keeping the sources of pgbouncer, then it was purely about the convenience for me. If the concern is about copying the pgbouncer's source code, I will change it tonight. The only reason I cloned the repo is that it was more convenient, but this is perfectly fine to only leave the build&packaging code and move it to Airflow's repository - I can easily checkout the code is f the pgbouncer from the 'official repo of pgbouncer' and build it and publish as binary as.i do now. The 'pgbouncer' source code is quite fine for that & it is - officially released and properly licensed by its authors, and has.multiple clones and community around so we can simply check it out from GitHub. and give our users script or instructions on how to do it if they need to do it on their own. But still, it had no 'official' image that was good for us - and their original packaging method was based not on the sources but on the binary being availavle locally (and go dependencies were not clear) so I added packaging code. But I can just leave the packaging code and use pgbouncer sources - no problem with that. I will do it later tonight. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
