[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16223494#comment-16223494
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-1734:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit f6810c9b4f6d821f3fd7ae775606a4295ab8cb20 in incubator-airflow's branch
refs/heads/v1-9-test from [~ahaidrey]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-airflow.git;h=f6810c9 ]
[AIRFLOW-1734][Airflow 1734] Sqoop hook/operator enhancements
Closes #2703 from Acehaidrey/sqoop_contrib_fixes
(cherry picked from commit 1d531555ecd594ee7ec2c5d3fc87f8d4bcc2c27e)
Signed-off-by: Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]>
> Sqoop Operator contains logic errors & needs options to pass more sqoop
> options
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AIRFLOW-1734
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1734
> Project: Apache Airflow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: contrib
> Reporter: Ace Haidrey
> Assignee: Ace Haidrey
> Labels: patch
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> After taking a look at the Sqoop Operator I have found a number of errors
> with it. I will describe them in depth on the PR I will make, but it includes
> assign wrong parameters, not hiding the users raw password in the logs
> (though a method to do that had been created in the hook, wrong if
> conditions, and the inability to add other sqoop options that would make
> sense to have the option to pass those.
> I have made some remarks in past commits about it too in the case I'm
> misinterpreting but regardless there are definitely errors.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2177#pullrequestreview-70046796
> Here is my PR with change by change explanation:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2703/files#diff-8e77f042c2e060bbfd60828431a91e9bL131
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
