Author: hughesj
Date: Fri Feb 11 23:47:07 2011
New Revision: 1069989
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069989&view=rev
Log:
Minor updates in prep for posting to board@
Modified:
aries/site/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.mdtext
Modified: aries/site/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.mdtext
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/aries/site/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.mdtext?rev=1069989&r1=1069988&r2=1069989&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- aries/site/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.mdtext
(original)
+++ aries/site/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.mdtext Fri Feb
11 23:47:07 2011
@@ -19,9 +19,11 @@ Notice: Licensed to the Apache Softwa
# February 2011 Board report
Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise OSGi
application programming model.
-Aries 0.3 has now been released. Aries Application 0.2.1 is being released to
assist Geronimo. Now that the first full Aries release since graduation has
happened, and that there is a desire to consider OSGi semantic versioning
guidelines we are discussing whether releasing at a finer grained level is more
appropriate.
+Aries 0.3 has now been released. Aries Application 0.2.1 is being released to
assist Geronimo. This is the first time Aries has released a single module.
-Community update: dev@ 117 subscribers (-1), user@ 129 subscribers (+2). The
dev@ list continues to be active with less traffic on the user@ list. No new
committers or PMC members since the January report.
+Now that the first full Aries release since graduation has happened, and that
there is a desire to consider OSGi semantic versioning guidelines we are
discussing whether releasing at a finer grained level is more appropriate.
There is much good discussion about what makes sense for Aries, with input from
what happens in Felix, Sling and ACE.
+
+Community update: largely unchanged since last month dev@ 117 subscribers,
user@ 127 subscribers. The dev@ list continues to be active with less traffic
on the user@ list. No new committers or PMC members since the January report.
There are no board level issues.
