Author: buildbot
Date: Fri Feb 11 23:47:12 2011
New Revision: 785324

Log:
Staging update by buildbot

Modified:
    
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.html

Modified: 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.html
==============================================================================
--- 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.html 
(original)
+++ 
websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/overview/boardreports/february-2011.html 
Fri Feb 11 23:47:12 2011
@@ -236,8 +236,9 @@
             <!-- Content -->
             <div class="wiki-content"><h1 
id="february_2011_board_report">February 2011 Board report</h1>
 <p>Aries delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling an enterprise 
OSGi application programming model.</p>
-<p>Aries 0.3 has now been released. Aries Application 0.2.1 is being released 
to assist Geronimo. Now that the first full Aries release since graduation has 
happened, and that there is a desire to consider OSGi semantic versioning 
guidelines we are discussing whether releasing at a finer grained level is more 
appropriate.</p>
-<p>Community update: dev@ 117 subscribers (-1), user@ 129 subscribers (+2). 
The dev@ list continues to be active with less traffic on the user@ list. No 
new committers or PMC members since the January report.</p>
+<p>Aries 0.3 has now been released. Aries Application 0.2.1 is being released 
to assist Geronimo. This is the first time Aries has released a single 
module.</p>
+<p>Now that the first full Aries release since graduation has happened, and 
that there is a desire to consider OSGi semantic versioning guidelines we are 
discussing whether releasing at a finer grained level is more appropriate. 
There is much good discussion about what makes sense for Aries, with input from 
what happens in Felix, Sling and ACE.</p>
+<p>Community update: largely unchanged since last month dev@ 117 subscribers, 
user@ 127 subscribers. The dev@ list continues to be active with less traffic 
on the user@ list. No new committers or PMC members since the January 
report.</p>
 <p>There are no board level issues.</p></div>
             <!-- Content -->
           </td>


Reply via email to