FatLittle commented on a change in pull request #1991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1991#discussion_r450588566
##########
File path:
cassandra/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/test/CassandraAdapterTest.java
##########
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static void load(Session session) {
.returns("tweet_id=f3c329de-d05b-11e5-b58b-90e2ba530b12\n"
+ "tweet_id=f3dbb03a-d05b-11e5-b58b-90e2ba530b12\n")
.explainContains("PLAN=CassandraToEnumerableConverter\n"
- + " CassandraLimit(fetch=[2])\n"
- + " CassandraProject(tweet_id=[$2])\n"
+ + " CassandraProject(tweet_id=[$2])\n"
+ + " CassandraLimit(fetch=[2])\n"
+ " CassandraFilter(condition=[=($0, '!PUBLIC!')])\n");
}
Review comment:
yes, the have the same cost. However, I do think in most case the new
plan is better.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
