sunjincheng121 edited a comment on pull request #2600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2600#issuecomment-964147736


   Turn off the related tests、temporarily delete problematic test、or using the 
release version of `calcite-avatica` modify the `.github/workflows/main.yml`  
can solve issue of CI builds  as a workaround.  So, we can keep the current 
states that disable avatica's travis job that uses calcite master or merge this 
PR and re-open the avatica's travis job in  CALCITE-4880. 
   
   Anyway, Feel free to close this PR as we can tracing this issue in 
CALCITE-4880 according to the result of the 
[discussion](https://lists.apache.org/thread/zyrftnms4p31lsvm93x1cynhnjnccbq7). 
// I also left a personal point of view in the discussion thread :)
   
   -If the result of the discussion is that the two modules are released 
uniformly, the problem of interdependence is not involved
   
   -If the result of the discussion is to maintain the independent release of 
the two modules and retain the early check of project compatibility, there may 
also be an opportunity to enhance the function of QUIDEM project, such as 
enhancing the ability of 
[ErrorCommand](https://github.com/julianhyde/quidem/blob/e4af1479471dae44c186aee4021dabde83d3532f/src/main/java/net/hydromatic/quidem/Quidem.java#L1175)
 to check the results, such as adding `ANYOF` semantic support, etc. then do 
some improvement on the `Bad library` test in 
[schema.iq](https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/f1db79fb876ac9ba3c405283e99bb0438e4e97be/server/src/test/resources/sql/schema.iq#L67)
 .
   
   Then,I suggest that we can discuss it in JIRA. or mailing list discussion 
thread. 
   
   Thanks all for pay attention to this PR. @vlsi @NobiGo @julianhyde 
   
   Best,
   Jincheng Sun
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to