xiedeyantu commented on code in PR #4244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4244#discussion_r2026303075
##########
core/src/test/resources/org/apache/calcite/test/RelOptRulesTest.xml:
##########
@@ -5980,6 +5980,64 @@ LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], T=[$10])
LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4],
SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8], $f9=[7934],
$f10=[CURRENT_TIMESTAMP])
LogicalFilter(condition=[=($0, 7934)])
LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
+]]>
+ </Resource>
+ </TestCase>
+ <TestCase name="testIntersectReorderRule">
+ <Resource name="sql">
+ <![CDATA[select deptno from emp
+intersect
+select deptno from emp where deptno > 5
+]]>
+ </Resource>
+ <Resource name="planBefore">
+ <![CDATA[
+LogicalIntersect(all=[false])
+ LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$7])
+ LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
+ LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$7])
+ LogicalFilter(condition=[>($7, 5)])
+ LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
+]]>
+ </Resource>
+ <Resource name="planAfter">
+ <![CDATA[
+EnumerableIntersect(all=[false])
Review Comment:
Thanks, I added the case of `intersect all`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
