commits  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Site: Update Sergey Nuyanzin to PMC [calcite] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7631] Introduce a composable RexImplementorTable SPI for operator code generation [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7632] Replace java.util.Stack with java.util.ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh zabetak
• [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace deprecated Stack with ArrayDeque in Pattern and TopDownRuleDriver [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7508] RelToSqlConverter registers wrong alias for correlation variable in visit(Project) [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7546] NullPointerException in SqlToRelConverter for UNNEST(array) AS alias under conformance with allowAliasUnnestItems=true mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (9089f40a0a -> 7311760481) mbudiu
  • (calcite) 01/02: [CALCITE-7630] BETWEEN unparses incorrectly when left side contains a BETWEEN expression mbudiu
  • (calcite) 02/02: Unparse should not use sep unless inside a list mbudiu
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7628] In the interpreter, MINUS and INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs return wrong result jhyde
• [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSUR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-5261] UNION(ALL) inside of the CURSOR throws an exception while validating the query [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7628] Interpreter gives wrong result for query with MINUS or INTERSECT with 3 or more inputs [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7626] Pass user-specified JAVA_OPTS to sqlline/sqlsh [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (8c1ac3640e -> beee52abac) zhenchen
• [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-6104] Aggregate function that references outer column should be evaluated in outer query [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated (55573d6dbe -> 8c1ac3640e) zabetak
• [PR] [CALCITE-7625] Unify sqlline scripts from different modules and update tutorial [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7625] Unify sqlline scripts from different modules and update tutorial [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7625] Unify sqlline scripts from different modules and update tutorial [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7625] Unify sqlline scripts from different modules and update tutorial [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7625] Unify sqlline scripts from different modules and update tutorial [calcite] via GitHub
• [PR] [CALCITE-7592] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7624] Support BigDecimal for FETCH and OFFSET in Enumerable [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7623] SemiJoinProjectTransposeRule should support ANTI joins zhenchen
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7620] Result of FILTER clause in window functions is incorrect xuzifu666
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7616] ProjectToLogicalProjectAndWindowRule should only match logical Project nodes mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7623] SemiJoinProjectTransposeRule should support ANTI joins [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7623] SemiJoinProjectTransposeRule should support ANTI joins [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7623] SemiJoinProjectTransposeRule should support ANTI joins [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7615] MAP_CONCAT does not accept NULL as an argument xuzifu666
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7599] Enhance parser to allow numeric literals as values in k/v hints as suggested by documentation mbudiu
• [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7618] Add filter pushdown support to the file adapter's CSV table implementation [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch site updated: Bump concurrent-ruby from 1.3.5 to 1.3.7 in /site github-bot
• (calcite) branch dependabot/bundler/site/concurrent-ruby-1.3.7 deleted (was 8766fec6e5) github-bot
• (calcite) branch main updated: Bump concurrent-ruby from 1.3.5 to 1.3.7 in /site zhenchen
• (calcite) branch site updated: Bump nokogiri from 1.19.3 to 1.19.4 in /site github-bot
• (calcite) branch dependabot/bundler/site/nokogiri-1.19.4 deleted (was b4bd058c7e) github-bot
• (calcite) branch main updated: Bump nokogiri from 1.19.3 to 1.19.4 in /site zhenchen
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7604] Add rule to pull up GROUP BY above JOIN zabetak
• [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [CALCITE-7622] Don't fire JoinProjectTransposeRule for ANTI/SEMI/LEFT_MARK JOIN [calcite] via GitHub
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7619] RexSimplify incorrectly simplifies IS_FALSE(x) when x is nullable mbudiu
• (calcite) branch main updated: [CALCITE-7614] UNNEST of an unqualified struct-rooted array path fails validation: "Column 's.s' not found" mbudiu
• (calcite-avatica) branch dependabot/bundler/site/concurrent-ruby-1.3.7 deleted (was 3dd4493dc) francischuang
• (calcite-avatica) branch main updated: Bump concurrent-ruby from 1.3.5 to 1.3.7 in /site francischuang
• (calcite-avatica) branch dependabot/bundler/site/concurrent-ruby-1.3.7 created (now 3dd4493dc) github-bot
• [PR] Bump concurrent-ruby from 1.3.5 to 1.3.7 in /site [calcite-avatica] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages