mihaibudiu commented on code in PR #4431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4431#discussion_r2176408531
##########
testkit/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/test/SqlOperatorTest.java:
##########
@@ -2545,6 +2545,30 @@ void testCastToBoolean(CastType castType,
SqlOperatorFixture f) {
f.checkNull("cast(null as integer array) || array[1]");
}
+ /** Test case for <a
href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7063";>
+ * Result type inferred for CONCAT_FUNCTION is incorrect for BINARY
arguments</a>. */
+ @Test void testConcatFuncMysql() {
+ final SqlOperatorFixture f = fixture().withLibrary(SqlLibrary.MYSQL);
+
+ // test for ByteString
+ f.setFor(SqlLibraryOperators.CONCAT_FUNCTION_MYSQL);
+ f.checkString("concat('a', x'61')", "6161", "BINARY(2) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat('abc', 'bb', 'cc')", "abcbbcc", "VARCHAR(7) NOT
NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'616263',x'62')", "61626362", "BINARY(4) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'616263','abc')", "616263616263", "BINARY(6) NOT
NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'61',x'62')", "6162", "BINARY(2) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(cast(x'61' as binary), cast(x'62' as binary), "
Review Comment:
first, the compiler may optimize this expression and perhaps may be able to
compute the precision.
but even if it's not, the precision of the result computed this way should
not be 4; it should be unlimited at least
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
