xuzifu666 commented on code in PR #4431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4431#discussion_r2176466785
##########
testkit/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/test/SqlOperatorTest.java:
##########
@@ -2545,6 +2545,30 @@ void testCastToBoolean(CastType castType,
SqlOperatorFixture f) {
f.checkNull("cast(null as integer array) || array[1]");
}
+ /** Test case for <a
href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7063";>
+ * Result type inferred for CONCAT_FUNCTION is incorrect for BINARY
arguments</a>. */
+ @Test void testConcatFuncMysql() {
+ final SqlOperatorFixture f = fixture().withLibrary(SqlLibrary.MYSQL);
+
+ // test for ByteString
+ f.setFor(SqlLibraryOperators.CONCAT_FUNCTION_MYSQL);
+ f.checkString("concat('a', x'61')", "6161", "BINARY(2) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat('abc', 'bb', 'cc')", "abcbbcc", "VARCHAR(7) NOT
NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'616263',x'62')", "61626362", "BINARY(4) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'616263','abc')", "616263616263", "BINARY(6) NOT
NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(x'61',x'62')", "6162", "BINARY(2) NOT NULL");
+ f.checkString("concat(cast(x'61' as binary), cast(x'62' as binary), "
Review Comment:
Yes, the latest submitted version returns varbinary for (binary, char),
which is not a problem.
However, the previous version that calculates binary precision will
definitely fail, because the subquery(```select concat(p1, p0) from (values
(x'616263', abc')) as t(p0, p1)```) cannot calculate the accurate precision of
non-literal, which leads to a conflict with the test case result.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
