mihaibudiu commented on PR #4619: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4619#issuecomment-3503814440
> This is still a draft. Should this work continue? I think this is great. If it holds the promise to solve many of the current decorrelator limits, we should adopt it. Do you see any downsides? As I commented elsewhere, one problem I foresee is that the UNNEST array operation cannot be represented without a Correlate node in general, so a new Rel node may need to be introduced to be able to handle such plans. But this can also be done later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
