jamesnetherton commented on a change in pull request #2342:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/2342#discussion_r596193134
##########
File path:
extensions/solr/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/quarkus/component/solr/deployment/SolrProcessor.java
##########
@@ -35,4 +40,27 @@ FeatureBuildItem feature() {
ExtensionSslNativeSupportBuildItem activateSslNativeSupport() {
return new ExtensionSslNativeSupportBuildItem(FEATURE);
}
+
+ @BuildStep
+ void registerForReflection(BuildProducer<ReflectiveClassBuildItem>
reflectiveClass, CombinedIndexBuildItem combinedIndex) {
+ // Register any classes within the application archive that contain
the Solr Field annotation
+ combinedIndex.getIndex()
+ .getAnnotations(FIELD_DOT_NAME)
+ .stream()
+ .map(annotationInstance -> {
+ AnnotationTarget target = annotationInstance.target();
+ AnnotationTarget.Kind kind = target.kind();
+ if (kind.equals(AnnotationTarget.Kind.FIELD)) {
+ ClassInfo classInfo =
target.asField().declaringClass();
+ return new ReflectiveClassBuildItem(false, true,
classInfo.name().toString());
+ } else if (kind.equals(AnnotationTarget.Kind.METHOD)) {
+ ClassInfo classInfo =
target.asMethod().declaringClass();
+ return new ReflectiveClassBuildItem(true, false,
classInfo.name().toString());
+ } else {
+ throw new RuntimeException(
Review comment:
I guess it depends if we 'support' folks bringing their own updated Solr
libs (either intentionally or via some other transitive dependency). In which
case, throwing an exception would prevent the project from building and a
warning may be a better option.
@ppalaga any thoughts on this?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
