aldettinger commented on a change in pull request #2342:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/2342#discussion_r596218683
##########
File path:
extensions/solr/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/quarkus/component/solr/deployment/SolrProcessor.java
##########
@@ -35,4 +40,27 @@ FeatureBuildItem feature() {
ExtensionSslNativeSupportBuildItem activateSslNativeSupport() {
return new ExtensionSslNativeSupportBuildItem(FEATURE);
}
+
+ @BuildStep
+ void registerForReflection(BuildProducer<ReflectiveClassBuildItem>
reflectiveClass, CombinedIndexBuildItem combinedIndex) {
+ // Register any classes within the application archive that contain
the Solr Field annotation
+ combinedIndex.getIndex()
+ .getAnnotations(FIELD_DOT_NAME)
+ .stream()
+ .map(annotationInstance -> {
+ AnnotationTarget target = annotationInstance.target();
+ AnnotationTarget.Kind kind = target.kind();
+ if (kind.equals(AnnotationTarget.Kind.FIELD)) {
+ ClassInfo classInfo =
target.asField().declaringClass();
+ return new ReflectiveClassBuildItem(false, true,
classInfo.name().toString());
+ } else if (kind.equals(AnnotationTarget.Kind.METHOD)) {
+ ClassInfo classInfo =
target.asMethod().declaringClass();
+ return new ReflectiveClassBuildItem(true, false,
classInfo.name().toString());
+ } else {
+ throw new RuntimeException(
Review comment:
If the targets are extended, there might be need to add some reflective
build items too. I think our itests would fail when we would complement our
tests with a new @Field annnotation on the new target.
I think camel-quarkus can throw when an updated solr libs is brought.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
