luigidemasi commented on PR #24065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/24065#issuecomment-4728035577

   @oscerd:
   >
   > **Blocking**
   > 
   > * CI is red on `build (25)` at the _"Fail if there are uncommitted 
changes"_ gate. It looks like the regenerated user-manual mirror of the 
validator-plugin doc 
(`docs/user-manual/modules/ROOT/pages/camel-yaml-dsl-validator-maven-plugin.adoc`)
 wasn't committed — the module source copy under 
`dsl/camel-yaml-dsl/.../src/main/docs/` was edited but not its generated 
mirror. Re-running the validator-plugin doc generation and committing the 
result should clear it.
   
   It should be fixed now ✅
   
   > **Minor**
   > 
   > * The PR also carries an unrelated `camel yaml normalize` → `camel 
validate normalize` rename across ~6 files. It looks like a legitimate catch-up 
to the CLI rebrand, but it's outside 
[CAMEL-23775](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-23775)'s scope and 
isn't called out in the description — worth a one-line note for reviewers, or 
splitting out.
   
   the rename is tiny, legitimate, and partly generated/doc catch-up. Splitting 
it would add process overhead for a low-risk wording correction, I'll update 
the pr description for the reviewers.
   
   
   > * `newYamlDeserializationContext()` now calls `ctx.start()` eagerly so 
registry resolvers load up front. That seems _more_ correct than before, but it 
is a behavioral change in when registry resolvers are discovered — please 
confirm it's intended (the new tests do pass).
   
   Yes, this is intentional.
   Previously `YamlDeserializationContext.start()` was the place where 
registry-provided `YamlDeserializerResolver` instances were loaded, but the 
route loader did not explicitly start the context after creating it. With the 
new classpath discovery path, resolver discovery has to happen before parsing 
starts, otherwise a module-provided YAML step may be encountered before its 
resolver has been loaded.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to