[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12896429#action_12896429
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-1072:
-------------------------------------------
I looked at the design document, but I didn't see the motivation for
special-case code for counters, instead of dealing with it with the more
general version vector code from CASSANDRA-580? Did I miss that?
Requiring CL.ALL on reads means it's basically unusable across multiple DCs,
which seems to me that it's not really all that much of an improvement over
using something like Cages w/in a single DC.
> Increment counters
> ------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1072
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Johan Oskarsson
> Assignee: Kelvin Kakugawa
> Attachments: CASSANDRA-1072-2.patch, Incrementcountersdesigndoc.pdf
>
>
> Break out the increment counters out of CASSANDRA-580. Classes are shared
> between the two features but without the plain version vector code the
> changeset becomes smaller and more manageable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
