[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14554333#comment-14554333 ]
Brian Hess commented on CASSANDRA-6477: ---------------------------------------- Can someone clarify whether, based on the current implementation, the Materialized View (or some of the Materialized Views, if there are more than one) can contain the mutation but the base table does not - or vice versa? Can you clarify what happens in each of the failure scenarios? It will be very important for us to know for sure when we discuss this with users/customers. > Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes) > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-6477 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: API, Core > Reporter: Jonathan Ellis > Assignee: Carl Yeksigian > Labels: cql > Fix For: 3.0 beta 1 > > > Local indexes are suitable for low-cardinality data, where spreading the > index across the cluster is a Good Thing. However, for high-cardinality > data, local indexes require querying most nodes in the cluster even if only a > handful of rows is returned. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)