[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14981297#comment-14981297
]
Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-10422:
--------------------------------------------
[~krummas] do we do incremental repair + subrange repair outside of that path
via nodetool?
I am not following why additional work is necessary if there is no path to
start this problematic repair combination? When you say full repair what do you
mean? Not a repair of a subrange? I thought that is the situation where we want
to anti-compact.
> Avoid anticompaction when doing subrange repair
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
> Fix For: 2.1.x, 2.2.x, 3.1
>
>
> If we do split the owned range in say 1000 parts, and then do one repair
> each, we could potentially anticompact every sstable 1000 times (ie, we
> anticompact the repaired range out 1000 times). We should avoid
> anticompacting at all in these cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
