[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14998949#comment-14998949
]
Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-10422:
--------------------------------------------
OK so I do I even want to bother with preventing them from requesting subrange
repair with incremental repair since it is orthogonal to anti-compaction in
2.2? For 2.1 it's sufficient to prevent them from requesting the problem
combination?
> Avoid anticompaction when doing subrange repair
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
> Fix For: 3.1, 2.1.x, 2.2.x
>
>
> If we do split the owned range in say 1000 parts, and then do one repair
> each, we could potentially anticompact every sstable 1000 times (ie, we
> anticompact the repaired range out 1000 times). We should avoid
> anticompacting at all in these cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
