[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15158576#comment-15158576
 ] 

Benjamin Lerer commented on CASSANDRA-10971:
--------------------------------------------

Could we not just keep your latest design but track the number of buffers in 
use and use it has a limit? Something like 
[this|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...blerer:10971-trunk].


{quote}As a nit, I think it might be safer to use an instanceof 
FileDirectSegment for enforceSegmentLimit in trunk. In case somebody decide to 
add a new sub-class to FileDirectSegment{quote}

Forget about that, I did not read the code properly.

> Compressed commit log has no backpressure and can OOM
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10971
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Local Write-Read Paths
>            Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
>            Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
>             Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.x
>
>
> I validated this via a unit test that slowed the ability of the log to drain 
> to the filesystem. The compressed commit log will keep allocating buffers 
> pending compression until it OOMs.
> I have a fix that am not very happy with because the whole signal a thread to 
> allocate a segment that depends on a resource that may not be available 
> results in some obtuse usage of {{CompleatableFuture}} to rendezvous 
> available buffers with {{CommitLogSegmentManager}} thread waiting to finish 
> constructing a new segment. The {{CLSM}} thread is in turn signaled by the 
> thread(s) that actually wants to write to the next segment, but aren't able 
> to do it themselves.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to