[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13073215#comment-13073215
]
Brian Lindauer commented on CASSANDRA-2975:
-------------------------------------------
The test didn't seem to produce any errors:
{code}
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.cassandra.utils.LongBloomFilterTest
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 75.354 sec
[junit]
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.cassandra.utils.LongLegacyBloomFilterTest
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 76.545 sec
{code}
I'll have to familiarize myself more with Cassandra before dealing with the
other issue you pointed out. I've just been using the BloomFilter class and
only have a very general understanding of the overall system.
> Upgrade MurmurHash to version 3
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-2975
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2975
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.8.3
> Reporter: Brian Lindauer
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: lhf
>
> MurmurHash version 3 was finalized on June 3. It provides an enormous speedup
> and increased robustness over version 2, which is implemented in Cassandra.
> Information here:
> http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/
> The reference implementation is here:
> http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/source/browse/trunk/MurmurHash3.cpp?spec=svn136&r=136
> I have already done the work to port the (public domain) reference
> implementation to Java in the MurmurHash class and updated the BloomFilter
> class to use the new implementation:
> https://github.com/lindauer/cassandra/commit/cea6068a4a3e5d7d9509335394f9ef3350d37e93
> Apart from the faster hash time, the new version only requires one call to
> hash() rather than 2, since it returns 128 bits of hash instead of 64.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
