[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17573987#comment-17573987
]
David Capwell commented on CASSANDRA-17103:
-------------------------------------------
I think accord.topology.TopologyManager#forKeys(accord.txn.Keys, long) also
produces the wrong results under some conditions; setup:
* RF=1 (this is 100% just to trick accord to touch multiple ranges)
* use org.apache.cassandra.dht.Murmur3Partitioner.LongToken#keyForToken to
generate a key that maps perfectly to the token for each instance
* touch each key
In the test above, we should have a min of 2 splits (possible 3rd to account
for wrapped ranges), but it actually only has 1! I see that the call to
accord.topology.Topology#forKeys(accord.txn.Keys) returns a single shard even
though there are 2 keys that map to 2 different shards!
The transaction doesn't fail I think because we don't block read/write to
out-of-bound ranges
Test
{code}
@Test
public void multipleShards() throws Throwable
{
String keyspace = "ks" + System.currentTimeMillis();
try (Cluster cluster = init(Cluster.build(2).start()))
{
cluster.schemaChange("CREATE KEYSPACE " + keyspace + " WITH
REPLICATION={'class':'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor': 1}");
cluster.schemaChange("CREATE TABLE " + keyspace + ".tbl (k blob, c
int, v int, primary key (k, c))");
cluster.forEach(node -> node.runOnInstance(() ->
AccordService.instance.createEpochFromConfigUnsafe()));
cluster.forEach(node -> node.runOnInstance(() ->
AccordService.instance.setCacheSize(0)));
List<String> tokens = cluster.stream()
.flatMap(i ->
StreamSupport.stream(Splitter.on(",").split(i.config().getString("initial_token")).spliterator(),
false))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
List<byte[]> keys = tokens.stream().map(t ->
(Murmur3Partitioner.LongToken)
Murmur3Partitioner.instance.getTokenFactory().fromString(t))
.map(Murmur3Partitioner.LongToken::keyForToken)
.map(ByteBufferUtil::getArray)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
cluster.get(1).runOnInstance(() -> {
AccordTxnBuilder txn = txn();
for (byte[] data : keys)
{
ByteBuffer key = ByteBuffer.wrap(data);
txn = txn.withRead("SELECT * FROM " + keyspace + ".tbl
WHERE k=? and c=0", key)
.withWrite("INSERT INTO " + keyspace + ".tbl (k, c,
v) VALUES (?, 0, 0)", key)
.withCondition(keyspace, "tbl", key, 0, NOT_EXISTS);
}
execute(txn);
});
}
}
{code}
I wrote this test to hit a condition in
accord.coordinate.tracking.ReadTracker#computeMinimalReadSetAndMarkInflight
that I thought was odd.
{code}
this.forEachTrackerForNode(node, (tracker, ignore) -> {
toRead.remove(tracker);
});
{code}
If we do for-each tracker then won't this clear toRead? I wanted to run
through a debugger to confirm but got hit by the fact that the Topology only
had a single Shard
> CEP-15 (C*): Messaging and storage engine integration
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-17103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17103
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Accord
> Reporter: Benedict Elliott Smith
> Priority: Normal
>
> This work encompasses implementing Accord’s storage and networking interfaces
> within Cassandra, so that messages may be sent around the cluster and
> exectuted
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
