[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17799887#comment-17799887
 ] 

Maxim Muzafarov commented on CASSANDRA-14572:
---------------------------------------------

I think we have a good history of decision-making for the further patch review 
process. I've figured out how to improve the traversal of the huge metric 
collections, the most efficient way is to compare and filter metric groups by 
prefix. This gives us an x4 boost on the same dataset.

Check out another benchmark to compare with the first results I got earlier:
!select keyspaces_group by string prefix.png|width=80%!

> Expose all table metrics in virtual table
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14572
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14572
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Legacy/Observability, Observability/Metrics
>            Reporter: Chris Lohfink
>            Assignee: Maxim Muzafarov
>            Priority: Low
>              Labels: virtual-tables
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>         Attachments: keyspayces_group responses times.png, keyspayces_group 
> summary.png, select keyspaces_group by string prefix.png, select 
> keyspaces_group compare with wo.png, select keyspaces_group without 
> value.png, systemv_views.metrics_dropped_message.png, thread_pools 
> benchmark.png
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While we want a number of virtual tables to display data in a way thats great 
> and intuitive like in nodetool. There is also much for being able to expose 
> the metrics we have for tooling via CQL instead of JMX. This is more for the 
> tooling and adhoc advanced users who know exactly what they are looking for.
> *Schema:*
> Initial idea is to expose data via {{((keyspace, table), metric)}} with a 
> column for each metric value. Could also use a Map or UDT instead of the 
> column based that can be a bit more specific to each metric type. To that end 
> there can be a {{metric_type}} column and then a UDT for each metric type 
> filled in, or a single value with more of a Map<Text, Text> style. I am 
> purposing the column type though as with {{ALLOW FILTERING}} it does allow 
> more extensive query capabilities.
> *Implementations:*
> * Use reflection to grab all the metrics from TableMetrics (see: 
> CASSANDRA-7622 impl). This is easiest and least abrasive towards new metric 
> implementors... but its reflection and a kinda a bad idea.
> * Add a hook in TableMetrics to register with this virtual table when 
> registering
> * Pull from the CassandraMetrics registery (either reporter or iterate 
> through metrics query on read of virtual table)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to