[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115458#comment-13115458
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-3262:
-------------------------------------------

The reason for this behavior (CASSANDRA-1314) is because for best performance, 
normal reads want exactly the opposite behavior of counters: we want to direct 
reads to the same replica so that the cache stays hot.  Put another way, if 
each replica is serving a distinct range then you get (replica count) times as 
much cache memory [with CL.ONE and RR off) than if each is getting the full 
range of requests from different coordinators.
                
> SimpleSnitch.compareEndpoints doesn't respect the intent of the snitch
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3262
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3262
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.6
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.8.7, 1.0.0
>
>         Attachments: 3262.patch
>
>
> SimpleSnitch is supposed to not sort the input addresses, thus respecting the 
> order of the partitioner. However, it's compareEndpoints instead uses IP 
> addresses comparison. Note that this matter when the dynamicSnitch fall back 
> to the wrapped snitch since it uses the compareEndpoint method then.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to