[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13207156#comment-13207156
]
paul cannon commented on CASSANDRA-3901:
----------------------------------------
I don't believe that the proposed fix for CASSANDRA-2434 covers these concerns
at all. I guess you could say that the *scope* of 2434 covers this, but I
think it's separate enough to deserve its own ticket, as you've done.
> write endpoints are not treated correctly, breaking consistency guarantees
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3901
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3901
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Peter Schuller
> Assignee: Peter Schuller
> Priority: Critical
>
> I had a nagging feeling this was the case ever since I started wanting
> CASSANDRA-3833 and thinking about hot to handle the association between nodes
> in the read set and nodes in the write set.
> I may be wrong (please point me in the direct direction if so), but I see no
> code anywhere that tries to (1) apply consistency level to currently normal
> endpoints only, and (2) "connect" a given read endpoint with a future write
> endpoint such that they are tied together for consistency purposes (parts of
> these concerns probably is covered by CASSANDRA-2434 but that ticket is more
> general).
> To be more clear about the problem: Suppose we have a ring of nodes, with a
> single node bootstrapping. Now, for a given row key suppose reads are served
> by A, B and C while writes are to go to A, B, C and D. In other words, D is
> the node bootstrapping. Suppose RF is 3 and A,B,C,D is ring order. There are
> a few things required for correct behavior:
> * Writes acked by D must never be treated as sufficient to satisfy
> consistency level since until it is part of the read set it does not count
> towards CL on reads.
> * Writes acked by B must *not* be treated as sufficient to satisfy
> consistency level *unless* the same write is *also* acked by D, because once
> D enters the ring, B will no longer be counting towards CL on reads. The only
> alternative is to make the read succeed and disallow D from entering the ring.
> We don't seem to be handling this at all (and it becomes more complicated
> with arbitrary transitions).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
