[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Philip Jenvey updated CASSANDRA-2897:
-------------------------------------
Attachment: 41ec9fc-2897.txt
Here's an alternative patch that also tackles just the non-compaction changes
(it's a little stale, against 41ec9fc)
Briefly looking at Sam's version, I'll note that:
o Mine handles entire row deletions in Memtable
o but it lacks changes to CompositesSearcher/SchemaLoader/CFMetaDataTest
(though I'm not familiar with these code paths, either)
o in KeysSearcher, I very likely should be using the compare method from
getValueValidator to check for staleness (instead of naively just calling
equals)
> Secondary indexes without read-before-write
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-2897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2897
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: secondary_index
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-CASSANDRA-2897-Secondary-indexes-without-read-before-w.txt,
> 41ec9fc-2897.txt
>
>
> Currently, secondary index updates require a read-before-write to maintain
> the index consistency. Keeping the index consistent at all time is not
> necessary however. We could let the (secondary) index get inconsistent on
> writes and repair those on reads. This would be easy because on reads, we
> make sure to request the indexed columns anyway, so we can just skip the row
> that are not needed and repair the index at the same time.
> This does trade work on writes for work on reads. However, read-before-write
> is sufficiently costly that it will likely be a win overall.
> There is (at least) two small technical difficulties here though:
> # If we repair on read, this will be racy with writes, so we'll probably have
> to synchronize there.
> # We probably shouldn't only rely on read to repair and we should also have a
> task to repair the index for things that are rarely read. It's unclear how to
> make that low impact though.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
