[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Ellis reopened CASSANDRA-833:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: Jonathan Ellis (was: Sylvain Lebresne)
Well, WTF.
{noformat}
commit 063c8f6cf7b12e976b0d7067037c52c548c6c0db
Author: Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Jun 9 00:16:27 2011 +0000
revert 1133443
git-svn-id:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8@1133610
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
commit 31f0ee95e927c09183dca77be7739305ba2eeab0
Author: Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Jun 8 15:45:54 2011 +0000
fix inconsistency window duringbootstrap
patch by slebresne; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-833
git-svn-id:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8@1133443
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
{noformat}
I have no memory of this. :)
Maybe it caused a regression?
> fix consistencylevel during bootstrap
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-833
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
> Fix For: 1.2.0 beta 2
>
> Attachments: 0001-Increase-CL-with-boostrapping-leaving-node.patch,
> 833-v2.txt
>
>
> As originally designed, bootstrap nodes should *always* get *all* writes
> under any consistencylevel, so when bootstrap finishes the operator can run
> cleanup on the old nodes w/o fear that he might lose data.
> but if a bootstrap operation fails or is aborted, that means all writes will
> fail until the ex-bootstrapping node is decommissioned. so starting in
> CASSANDRA-722, we just ignore dead nodes in consistencylevel calculations.
> but this breaks the original design. CASSANDRA-822 adds a partial fix for
> this (just adding bootstrap targets into the RF targets and hinting
> normally), but this is still broken under certain conditions. The real fix
> is to consider consistencylevel for two sets of nodes:
> 1. the RF targets as currently existing (no pending ranges)
> 2. the RF targets as they will exist after all movement ops are done
> If we satisfy CL for both sets then we will always be in good shape.
> I'm not sure if we can easily calculate 2. from the current TokenMetadata,
> though.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
