[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13900054#comment-13900054
]
Daniel Shelepov commented on CASSANDRA-1983:
--------------------------------------------
Is this still needed? Naming in 2.0+ is still incremental as far as I can
tell.
I'd like to work on this fix while I'm learning the codebase.
> Make sstable filenames contain a UUID instead of increasing integer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1983
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1983
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David King
> Priority: Minor
>
> sstable filenames look like CFName-1569-Index.db, containing an integer for
> uniqueness. This makes it possible (however unlikely) that the integer could
> overflow, which could be a problem. It also makes it difficult to collapse
> multiple nodes into a single one with rsync. I do this occasionally for
> testing: I'll copy our 20 node cluster into only 3 nodes by copying all of
> the data files and running cleanup; at present this requires a manual step of
> uniqifying the overlapping sstable names. If instead of an incrementing
> integer, it would be handy if these contained a UUID or somesuch that
> guarantees uniqueness across the cluster.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
