[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13941799#comment-13941799
]
Edward Capriolo commented on CASSANDRA-6895:
--------------------------------------------
I do not think it is MAJOR either that is the default value in jira. From my
standpoint it makes more sense for a function named remove() to fully complete
the remove in the data structure.
{quote}
It is how it is for a reason.
{quote}
Can you please explain to me why a function named internalRemove() does not
fully update the data structure and relies on code inside iterator to finish
the job? I would like to understand.
> ArrayBackedSortedColumns removeInternal should update sortedsize
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6895
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Edward Capriolo
> Assignee: Edward Capriolo
>
> I was trying to use ArrayBackedblabla directly and I noticed that while
> internalAdd updates the sorted size internal remove does not.
> https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/cassandra/compare/ArrayBackBackToCali?expand=1
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
