[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14132976#comment-14132976
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-7919:
---------------------------------------------
bq. This is not true if we incorporate CASSANDRA-7925
I don't see how CASSANDRA-7925 changes that really. When I say client, I mean
process. You can have multiple client/process on one box, but that don't change
the fact that a given client process will have one lsb for its lifetime.
bq. we should not deliver the TimeUUID back to clients, and we should not store
it fully indefinitely
I don't have a problem with that.
> Change timestamp representation to timeuuid
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7919
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: T Jake Luciani
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> In order to overcome some of the issues with timestamps (CASSANDRA-6123) we
> need to migrate to a better timestamp representation for cells.
> Since drivers already support timeuuid it makes sense to migrate to this
> internally (see CASSANDRA-7056)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
