commits  

Messages by Thread

• [I] Possible missing documentation on plugins [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Possible missing documentation on plugins [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Possible to scroll past the usage records table's footer [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Possible to scroll past the usage records table's footer [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Purge usage records action shown to users without access to `removeRawUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Purge usage records action shown to users without access to `removeRawUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Generate usage records action shown to users without access to `generateUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Generate usage records action shown to users without access to `generateUsageRecords` [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Usage server metrics section shown to users without access to the API [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Usage server metrics section shown to users without access to the API [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up network permissions on account deletion [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] merge bug fix for #9037; no retrieval of null hosts [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] consider a valid ipv4 address as a validish ipv4 /32 cidr [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM goes into alert state if secstorage.allowed.internal.sites is set to an IP (not CIDR) [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-4.20 updated (47d07a02ac0 -> bdf29b87799) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-4.19 updated (5611139c239 -> 22fb347a2a7) dahn
• [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch add-ip-range-checks-sharednet created (now 524fff41aa8) pearl11594
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: Add checks if IP range is passed if Shared Network pearl11594
• Re: [PR] fix nat table by getting the fitting device for an address [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add support to RBD erasure code pools [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump commons-io:commons-io from 2.8.0 to 2.14.0 [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] network: Add BGP+EVPN+VXLAN script to main repository and Agent package [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bnr resource limits [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [WIP] Preferred storage pool setting as a cluster setting [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support of snapshot copy to StorPool primary storage in different zones [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Refactor alert email generation method [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Log4j2 refactor cloud api module [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 4.19 updated (21416cd4034 -> afc95f1ccc5) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch main updated (d1cf45365a6 -> fadb39ece73) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated (bd488c4bba0 -> ab76d3c9ccb) dahn
  • (cloudstack) 01/02: Merge release branch 4.19 to 4.20 dahn
  • (cloudstack) 02/02: merge errors fixed dahn
• Re: [PR] CheckOnHostCommand: add missing timeout setting [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] CheckOnHostCommand: add missing timeout setting [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] CheckOnHostCommand: add missing timeout setting [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] CheckOnHostCommand: add missing timeout setting [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS session [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-4.20 updated (48d4b7d1eb9 -> 47d07a02ac0) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.19 updated: Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state (#9725) dahn
• [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HA : Hosts persist in the Suspect state in HA cluster with KVMHAProvider [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated: server, plugin: enhance storage stats for IOPS (#10034) shwstppr
• Re: [PR] Flexible timeout for commands MS sends to the agents [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated: Introducing granular command timeouts global setting (#9659) harikrishna
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-4.20 updated (f2343b62ff7 -> 48d4b7d1eb9) dahn
• Re: [PR] Fix comparison of Long objects to use primitives [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch main updated: Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml` (#9133)" (#10161) weizhou
• (cloudstack) branch 4.21-fix-check-yaml deleted (was 88048f96076) weizhou
• (cloudstack) branch 4.21-fix-check-yaml created (now 88048f96076) weizhou
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: .github: fix check-yaml weizhou
• [I] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Virtual Router to output logs to Cloudstack Mgmt Server, so Operator can monitor via Zabbix, Loki or other system [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null) [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] Vmware fix test errors [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml`" [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch revert-9133-pre-commit-check-yaml created (now 61328bcd54a) dahn
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: Revert "pre-commit: add hook `check-yaml` (#9133)" dahn
• Re: [PR] [Veeam] disable jobs but keep backups [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Veeam] disable jobs but keep backups [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [I] ACL Rule works intermittently, requires reboot or cleanup [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ACL Rule works intermittently, requires reboot or cleanup [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ACL Rule works intermittently, requires reboot or cleanup [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ACL Rule works intermittently, requires reboot or cleanup [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Adding Count Resource Domain [cloudstack] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reserve memory for host [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reserve memory for host [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reserve memory for host [cloudstack] via GitHub
• [I] `cloudstack-documentation`: `.rst` files possible spelling mistakes [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cloudstack-documentation`: `.rst` files possible spelling mistakes [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cloudstack-documentation`: `.rst` files possible spelling mistakes [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `cloudstack-documentation`: `.rst` files possible spelling mistakes [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack-go) branch fix-vm-usage-history updated (b471df6 -> 818910e) pearl11594
• Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict the migration of volumes attached to VMs in Starting state [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack-documentation) branch 4.19 updated: vxlan prefix must be given to prevent interpretation as vlan (#465) dahn
• (cloudstack-documentation) branch main updated: added steps to expose service a vmware based cks cluster (#466) dahn
• Re: [I] Prometheus integration: requiring allowed ips is too restrictive [cloudstack] via GitHub
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-main updated (a31574890fe -> e3fbe41efbc) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch healthcheck-4.20 updated (245cbdc50bb -> f2343b62ff7) dahn
• (cloudstack) branch main updated (5bae1188ff6 -> 30b2588c062) dahn
  • (cloudstack) 01/01: Merge release branch 4.20 to main dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated: log name change after merge forward dahn
• (cloudstack) branch 4.20 updated (3d0b4fca847 -> 79316450d19) dahn

• Earlier messages