Pearl1594 opened a new issue #6044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6044


   ## Background
   Over recent years, Edge computing has been gaining popularity as it defines 
a model that brings compute and storage closer to
   where they are consumed by the end-user. By being closer to the end-user a 
better experience can be provided with reduction on overall latency, lower 
bandwidth requirements, lower TCO, more flexible hardware/software model, while 
also ensuring security and reliability. To align ACS with this evolving cloud 
computing model we would like to propose an idea of supporting Edge Zones in 
CloudStack, which
   can be also looked upon as a lightweight zone, with minimal resources.
   
   ## Requirement
   Today, when a Zone is setup in CloudStack, it by default comes up with a 
secondary storage VM(SSVM) and a console proxy VM(CPVM). As part of this 
project, we would need to define a new zone type to decide the change in 
workflow required to ensure that a CPVM & SSVM isn't spawned up by default. 
Basic characteristics of an Edge zone include:
   - no need for Secondary Storage
   - no Secondary Storage VM
   - no Console Proxy VM
   - Local storage only as typically an edge device comprises of a single 
compute node (host)
   - And supports L2 and Isolated networks.
   
   A high-level view of an edge zone would look something like:
   
![Edge-zone-example](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10495417/155530992-8bdeee61-498b-4525-9a8f-93bb2b9548bb.png)
   
   
   ## Relevant Skills:
   Java
   MySQL
   Vue.js (Basic)
   
   ## Difficulty
   Medium
   
   ## Project Duration:
   175 hours
   
   ## Project Mentors
   Alex Mattioli
   Nicolas Vazquez
   Pearl Dsilva
   
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to