Updated Branches:
  refs/heads/4.2 da10df78e -> 4cc8af053

CLOUDSTACK-4682: VMs are getting deployed with shared service offering and 
local compute offering
VM deployment is fine, issue is in attach volume where all possible scenarios 
are not handled.
The following needs to be logic of attached volume:
1. if data volume scope is zone then allow attach (this is already there)
2. if data volume scope is cluster
   a. if root volume scope is host, allow if both are in same cluster (already 
there)
   b. if root volume scope is zone, allow if vm and data volume in same cluster 
(fixed as part of this commit)
3. if data volume scope is host allow if vm and data volume in same host (fixed 
as part of this commit)


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/4cc8af05
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/tree/4cc8af05
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/diff/4cc8af05

Branch: refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 4cc8af053267c5c0dc9ed45fd8fcb4158b3ecaa9
Parents: da10df7
Author: Koushik Das <[email protected]>
Authored: Wed Oct 16 17:02:45 2013 +0530
Committer: Koushik Das <[email protected]>
Committed: Wed Oct 16 17:16:13 2013 +0530

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 .../com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java    | 24 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob/4cc8af05/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java 
b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
index f3e1d9f..b680da1 100644
--- a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
+++ b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
@@ -1591,15 +1591,25 @@ public class VolumeManagerImpl extends ManagerBase 
implements VolumeManager {
         }
 
         if (storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() != 
storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeType()) {
-            if (storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.CLUSTER && 
storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.HOST) {
-                HostScope hs = (HostScope)storeForRootStoreScope;
-                if 
(storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeId().equals(hs.getClusterId())) {
+            if (storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.CLUSTER) {
+                Long vmClusterId = null;
+                if (storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.HOST) {
+                    HostScope hs = (HostScope)storeForRootStoreScope;
+                    vmClusterId = hs.getClusterId();
+                } else if (storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == 
ScopeType.ZONE) {
+                    Long hostId = 
_vmInstanceDao.findById(rootVolumeOfVm.getInstanceId()).getHostId();
+                    if (hostId != null) {
+                        HostVO host = _hostDao.findById(hostId);
+                        vmClusterId = host.getClusterId();
+                    }
+                }
+                if (storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeId().equals(vmClusterId)) {
                     return false;
                 }
-            }
-            if (storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.CLUSTER && 
storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.HOST) {
-                HostScope hs = (HostScope)storeForDataStoreScope;
-                if 
(storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeId().equals(hs.getClusterId())) {
+            } else if (storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.HOST 
&&
+                    (storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == 
ScopeType.CLUSTER || storeForRootStoreScope.getScopeType() == ScopeType.ZONE)) {
+                Long hostId = 
_vmInstanceDao.findById(rootVolumeOfVm.getInstanceId()).getHostId();
+                if (storeForDataStoreScope.getScopeId().equals(hostId)) {
                     return false;
                 }
             }

Reply via email to