GutoVeronezi commented on PR #7417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7417#issuecomment-1738971647

   > @GutoVeronezi , I just tried to review the link in the description and it 
seems to be gone, can you check? `An error code 404 occured while trying to 
fetch 
https://lists.apache.org/api/thread.lua?id=qvb3kx78m7lvc21d90ld00v8o8wd27r: 
Content not found `
   
   @DaanHoogland I may have bumped the backspace button accidentally while 
writing the description, the link was missing the final character. I adjusted 
the description, the correct link is 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/qvb3kx78m7lvc21d90ld00v8o8wd27ro.
   
   
   > any progress on this @GutoVeronezi ?
   
   The topics described in 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7417#issuecomment-1500783920 will 
guide us in defining how to use it and guaranteeing that everyone complies with 
the new pattern. Resuming the discussion of them:
   
   Regarding point `a`, I believe creating a file for each `VIEW` is the best 
option; it will require more effort on backporting, however, it will bring us 
more organization and better backtracking.
   
   About point `b`, I do not have a formed opinion about it; we could go either 
way; we would just have to adjust the GH Actions (yet to be done) to comply 
with it.
   
   In respect of point `c` (and also @DaanHoogland's comment -- 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7417#discussion_r1168510398), the 
point in creating `VIEW` is to help us better handle the data via Java. In the 
schema files, we have total flexibility to use SQL as we want; therefore, if 
necessary to use a `VIEW` logic at some point, we could reproduce it easily in 
the query. With that, we might want to execute the `VIEW` scripts only after 
applying all the patches, as @DaanHoogland wondered.
   
   What are your thoughts on this?
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to